PDA

View Full Version : Stormtrack Visitor statistics


Tim Vasquez
12-23-2005, 02:24 PM
Let's check out the stats and see what browsers people are using to access Stormtrack:


# #reqs #pages browser

1 54423 6561 MSIE

2 14298 3032 Firefox

3 5392 5033 Netscape (compatible)

4 2423 2423 Mediapartners-Google

5 1876 1765 msnbot

6 1297 123 Netscape

7 861 166 Mozilla

8 463 81 Safari

9 255 255 ichiro

10 230 230 NG


Hmm... so far, IE users outnumber Firefox users by a factor of over 3. (come on, y'all, Firefox is a great browser!)

Let's check out everyone's OS.


1 69472 9498 Windows

58553 8235 Windows XP

6815 897 Windows 2000

1123 161 Windows 98

1771 116 Windows ME

959 48 Windows NT

81 28 Windows 95

66 8 Windows Server 2003

104 5 Unknown Windows

2 8093 7703 OS unknown

3 3318 2715 Known robots

4 862 126 Macintosh

5 361 65 Unix

Holy cow, people are still using Windows 95! Our esteemed Mac and Linux users, sadly, trail far, far behind.

Where are all those users coming from?
7806 4.85% cox.net

7095 12.05% googlebot.com

3927 2.81% charter.com

3846 6.86% swbell.net

3779 7.54% comcast.net

2826 3.19% rr.com

2412 1.37% mchsi.com

1613 10.35% 207.46

1461 2.34% verizon.net

1359 2.27% qwest.net

Cox, of course, is a big cablemodem provider in Oklahoma, with swbell.com a popular DSL provider, so no surprise there. Nice to see googlebot loves chasing. The 207.46 IP is Microsoft, i.e. MSN.

Who's sending hits our way? Let's check out the referrer log:
108 108 19.09% http://www.google.com/search

104 56 15.58% http://images.google.com/imgres

21 1 2.64% http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/

jensen/b-1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/jensen/2.htm&h

=512&w=768&sz=44&tbnid=psp5osBq6qwJ:&tbnh=94&tbnw=141&

hl=en&start=6&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dblowing+snow%26svnum%

3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D

13 13 0.54% http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/

library/1995/jun8pix8.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/library

/1995/jun8.htm&h=410&w=295&sz=17&tbnid=92XD6WMCKmUJ:&tbn

h=121&tbnw=87&hl=en&start=13&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtornadoes

%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D

13 0 0.65% http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/

library/1995/jun8pix8.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.stormtrack.org/library

/1995/jun8.htm&h=410&w=295&sz=17&tbnid=92XD6WMCKmUJ:&tbn

h=121&tbnw=87&hl=en&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtornadoes%26svnum

%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D&frame=small

91 0 6.58% http://www.kcskyscrapers.com/newforum/index.php

10 0 0.49% http://www.kcskyscrapers.com/newforum/index.php?topic=7368.20

37 33 4.58% http://search.yahoo.com/search

37 0 1.33% http://www.texanstalk.com/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl

15 0 0.66% http://www.texanstalk.com/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=1135124636

25 16 2.22% http://images.google.ca/imgres

23 0 6.93% http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm

19 0 7.72% http://twistervideos.com/content/section/10/38/

19 14 1.45% http://images.google.co.uk/imgres

16 0 1.47% http://forum.socalweather.net/viewtopic.php

15 15 0.59% http://www.stumbleupon.com/refer.html

12 12 1.02% http://search.msn.com/results.aspx

11 0 2.21% http://www.streetsourcemag.com/IM/viewusercontent.aspx

Interesting that I see texanstalk.com on there quite often... evidently a lot of the folks there like to talk severe weather.

And the most popular thread for yesterday? The award goes to When is the best time to chase (http://www.stormtrack.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9485), with 209 hits. Looks like everyone is antsy for spring to set in.

Tim

Carrie Halliday
12-26-2005, 11:32 PM
I am the reason for Texanstalk.com. It is one of my football boards, but a local one for us Texans fans. We do talk weather when things get exciting around these parts, and I am usually the one who gets asked all the questions. I refer them here to research and learn more, and have uncovered some new weather enthusiasts in the process.

You can never have enough weather friends. 8)

CHris Whitehead
01-09-2006, 02:18 AM
IIIIIIIICHIIIIIIIIIIIROOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Anthony Petito
01-10-2006, 05:48 AM
This was interesting:


Windows Server 2003


Let's just hope they're not surfing with a production server :)