Stormtrack   0
Want to place an ad?


Go Back   Stormtrack > Weather > Weather and chasing

Weather and chasing Meteorology discussion by experienced chasers and meteorologists. This is the place to talk shop. Storm events may NOT be discussed in this forum unless 48 hours has passed. Please use the Target Area section for that purpose.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes


Old 11-20-2009, 09:50 AM   #21
rdale
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Kuster View Post
Unfortunately, the DP upgrade will not decrease the time needed to obtain a volume scan. The phased-array radars will be able to scan very quickly, but that is still 15-20 years in the future.
On the other hand - there have been proposals for VCP scan strategies in the 2.5-3 minute range with the 88D, but it's been a while since I've heard anything about that. It might be more than the current hardware can handle?
rdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 10:28 AM   #22
Greg Stumpf
Stormtrack supporter
 
Greg Stumpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 683
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale View Post
On the other hand - there have been proposals for VCP scan strategies in the 2.5-3 minute range with the 88D, but it's been a while since I've heard anything about that. It might be more than the current hardware can handle?
This is one way to achieve faster scan updates with a conventional antenna radar: http://www.roc.noaa.gov/wsr88d/NNOW/AVSET.aspx
__________________
Greg Stumpf

Any of my posts made in public forums express my opinion, and not necessarily the opinions of NOAA, NWS, NSSL, or my employer.
Greg Stumpf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 11:28 AM   #23
Mike Smith
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita
Posts: 832
Thanks: 73
Thanked 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Greg, this is terrific.

Now the questions:

What is the status of getting this implemented?

Has anyone ever looked at an automatic sector scan function during severe weather? That would also speed things up. For example, if it is May 3, 1999, at 3pm, I doubt anyone cared whether the radar spun the full 360° to see nothing east of KTLX.

One could make the radar do a 360° every 10 minutes or so to see if anything has developed in the non-sampled area, but we would get much more frequent scans in the area of interest.

Mike
Mike Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 04:06 PM   #24
Greg Stumpf
Stormtrack supporter
 
Greg Stumpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 683
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default

AVSET has not yet been approved as to my latest information.

The system you describe, using sector scans, is done with CASA where the radars are networked and collaborating. It's also done with the phased-array radar, and since the scanning is electronic, you can have separate maximum elevation scans for each radial. Not sure if the WSR-88D program is considering any of this for their radars. However, any major changes like that would require approval from all three agencies that support the WSR-88D (NWS, DOD, FAA).

Here's another AVSET link: http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/155324.pdf

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Smith View Post
Greg, this is terrific.

Now the questions:

What is the status of getting this implemented?

Has anyone ever looked at an automatic sector scan function during severe weather? That would also speed things up. For example, if it is May 3, 1999, at 3pm, I doubt anyone cared whether the radar spun the full 360° to see nothing east of KTLX.

One could make the radar do a 360° every 10 minutes or so to see if anything has developed in the non-sampled area, but we would get much more frequent scans in the area of interest.

Mike
__________________
Greg Stumpf

Any of my posts made in public forums express my opinion, and not necessarily the opinions of NOAA, NWS, NSSL, or my employer.
Greg Stumpf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 04:38 PM   #25
Shane Adams
User is suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 3,248
Thanks: 3
Thanked 63 Times in 30 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Kuster View Post
Unfortunately, the DP upgrade will not decrease the time needed to obtain a volume scan. The phased-array radars will be able to scan very quickly, but that is still 15-20 years in the future.
Ahhhhh yes....my mistake. I was thinking of PA. Thanks for the clarification.
__________________
Shane Adams - PASSION TWIST
Who cares how great your forecast was if you didn't chase?
Shane Adams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 05:05 PM   #26
Jeff Duda
Member
 
Jeff Duda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 638
Thanks: 49
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Kuster View Post
Unfortunately, the DP upgrade will not decrease the time needed to obtain a volume scan. The phased-array radars will be able to scan very quickly, but that is still 15-20 years in the future.
15 - 20 years??? I was always hearing about how it should be arriving within the next 10. Man I hope it isn't that long before phased array becomes available. I'll be an old man by then!
__________________
B.S. Meteorology, B.S. Mathematics, Iowa State University, 2009
storm chasing
Jeff Duda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 06:37 PM   #27
Jim Zandonai
Member
 
Jim Zandonai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rockford IL.
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

I hope so too ! By then I'll be 'arm chairing' everything
The technology is obviously already there so I assume the major thing that would stretch it out is budget..but I could be wrong. Time will tell.
__________________
Jim Zandonai

http://onthegustfront.blogspot.com
Jim Zandonai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 07:00 PM   #28
rdale
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Zandonai View Post
The technology is obviously already there so I assume the major thing that would stretch it out is budget
I'd last heard an update about a year ago - the filtering and display of weather data vs. other returns was much more primitive than had been anticipated. That's probably why the schedule isn't going as fast as originally planned.
rdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 02:04 PM   #29
rdale
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Stumpf View Post
AVSET has not yet been approved as to my latest information.
There was a meeting earlier this week where the recommendation was made to have AVSET included in Build 13.
rdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2010, 08:56 PM   #30
Jeff Duda
Member
 
Jeff Duda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 638
Thanks: 49
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
Default Build 12.1 upgrade

Resurrecting this thread as new TINs have been released lately regarding the scheduling of the dual-pol upgrades. Looks like there will be some upgrades to super res as well (including increased resolution for the higher tilts if I am understanding it correctly). References:

http://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/Publi..._super_res.pdf
http://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/DUALPOL/DPLevelII.aspx
__________________
B.S. Meteorology, B.S. Mathematics, Iowa State University, 2009
storm chasing
Jeff Duda is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2010 Stormtrack