![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Weather and chasing Meteorology discussion by experienced chasers and meteorologists. This is the place to talk shop. Storm events may NOT be discussed in this forum unless 48 hours has passed. Please use the Target Area section for that purpose. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
|
On the other hand - there have been proposals for VCP scan strategies in the 2.5-3 minute range with the 88D, but it's been a while since I've heard anything about that. It might be more than the current hardware can handle?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Stormtrack supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 683
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Greg Stumpf Any of my posts made in public forums express my opinion, and not necessarily the opinions of NOAA, NWS, NSSL, or my employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita
Posts: 832
Thanks: 73
Thanked 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
Greg, this is terrific.
Now the questions: What is the status of getting this implemented? Has anyone ever looked at an automatic sector scan function during severe weather? That would also speed things up. For example, if it is May 3, 1999, at 3pm, I doubt anyone cared whether the radar spun the full 360° to see nothing east of KTLX. One could make the radar do a 360° every 10 minutes or so to see if anything has developed in the non-sampled area, but we would get much more frequent scans in the area of interest. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Stormtrack supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 683
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
AVSET has not yet been approved as to my latest information.
The system you describe, using sector scans, is done with CASA where the radars are networked and collaborating. It's also done with the phased-array radar, and since the scanning is electronic, you can have separate maximum elevation scans for each radial. Not sure if the WSR-88D program is considering any of this for their radars. However, any major changes like that would require approval from all three agencies that support the WSR-88D (NWS, DOD, FAA). Here's another AVSET link: http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/155324.pdf Quote:
__________________
Greg Stumpf Any of my posts made in public forums express my opinion, and not necessarily the opinions of NOAA, NWS, NSSL, or my employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
User is suspended
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 3,248
Thanks: 3
Thanked 63 Times in 30 Posts
|
Ahhhhh yes....my mistake. I was thinking of PA. Thanks for the clarification.
__________________
Shane Adams - PASSION TWIST Who cares how great your forecast was if you didn't chase? |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 638
Thanks: 49
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
|
15 - 20 years??? I was always hearing about how it should be arriving within the next 10. Man I hope it isn't that long before phased array becomes available. I'll be an old man by then!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rockford IL.
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I hope so too ! By then I'll be 'arm chairing' everything
![]() The technology is obviously already there so I assume the major thing that would stretch it out is budget..but I could be wrong. Time will tell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
|
I'd last heard an update about a year ago - the filtering and display of weather data vs. other returns was much more primitive than had been anticipated. That's probably why the schedule isn't going as fast as originally planned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 4,231
Thanks: 139
Thanked 139 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 638
Thanks: 49
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
|
Resurrecting this thread as new TINs have been released lately regarding the scheduling of the dual-pol upgrades. Looks like there will be some upgrades to super res as well (including increased resolution for the higher tilts if I am understanding it correctly). References:
http://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/Publi..._super_res.pdf http://www.roc.noaa.gov/WSR88D/DUALPOL/DPLevelII.aspx |
|
|
|
| Thanked by: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|